Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1215/2019

Case between K.V.Saradha et al vs Manaseswary et al regarding partition of property

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-04-05
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months
Case Closed
Fri, 04/05/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.V.Saradha and others, are seeking a partition of property from the defendants, Manaseswary and others, who are legal heirs of the late Unnaman Velachan. The case involves claims on property that has not been partitioned since the death of the patriarch in 1959.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaint schedule property is partible and assigned shares to the plaintiffs and defendants. The legal heirs are entitled to their respective shares from the residential property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of the plaint schedule property among the heirs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaint schedule property is partible and assigned shares to the plaintiffs and defendants. The legal heirs are entitled to their respective shares from the residential property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged proof of their claims over the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged proof of their claims over the property.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

It is decreed that the plaint schedule property is partible and plaintiffs No.2 and 5 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share, ie,90/450 shares. It is decreed that the plaintiffs 3 and 4 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share, ie,90/450 share. The plaintiff No.6 and defendants No.1 to 4 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share. The defendants 5 to 10 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share ie.,90/450 shares of plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.V.Saradha
Party Age
80
Relation
D/o Velachan and W/o Madhavan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.V.Anirudhan
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o Velachan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarada P.K
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o Bhuanachandran
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aneesh
Relation
S/o Bhuanachandran
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Haridasini
Party Age
66
Relation
D/o Velachan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manaseswary
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o Haridasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Santhosh
Party Age
49
Relation
Husband of deceased (Mahileswary D/o Haridasan)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashwin
Party Age
16
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abhishek
Party Age
17
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kusumam
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o Sarada
Plaintiffs Documents
copy of sale deed no 230/92, Original receipt no 5584 issued by Shanmughapuram Co-operative society, Original receipt no 9548 issued by Shanmughapuram Co-operative society, Original receipt no 4782.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.R.Jayaprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is decreed that the plaint schedule property is partible.
Evidence:
It is decreed that the plaint schedule property is partible.
Relief Type: Distribution
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs and defendants are entitled to their respective shares in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
It is decreed that the plaintiffs No.2 and 5 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share, ie,90/450 shares.
Relief Type: Distribution
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs 3 and 4 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share.
Evidence:
It is decreed that the plaintiffs 3 and 4 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share, ie,90/450 share.
Relief Type: Distribution
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff No.6 and defendants No.1 to 4 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share.
Evidence:
The plaintiff No.6 and defendants No.1 to 4 are jointly entitled to get 1/ 5th share.
Relief Type: Distribution
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants 5 to 10 are jointly entitled to get 1/5th share of plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants 5 to 10 are jointly entitled to get 1/ 5th share ie.,90/450 shares of plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of sale deed submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt issued by Shanmughapuram Co-operative society submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt issued by Shanmughapuram Co-operative society submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.V.Saradha et al vs Manaseswary et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between K.V.Saradha et al vs Manaseswary et al regarding partition of property

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/05/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won