Case Summary
Case involves partition and separate allotment of shares in the schedule property. Petitioners seek final decree for partition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property
Case Type
Partition
Final Judgment
No
Final decree for partition passed. Shares allocated as per preliminary decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The decree schedule properties shall be divided 64 equal shares by metes and bounds. Property shown as ABCDEFGHI in Ext.C2 plan, having an extent of 18.03 cents, is allotted to the share of the petitioners and 3rd respondent. Property shown as MONFGHIAJ in Ext.C2 plan, having an extent of 9.38 cents, is allotted to the share of the 2nd and 3rd respondent.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Faizal
- Party Age
- 31
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Fazil
- Party Age
- 29
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 71
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayishu
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o Moideen Parappurath
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunnekkattu Aboobacker's wife
- Party Age
- 56
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission plan submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition and Allotment of Shares
Case Code
Case between Kunnekkattu Aboobacker's children vs Kunnekkattu Muhammed's children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Kunnekkattu Aboobacker's children vs Kunnekkattu Muhammed's children et al regarding partition