Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 10 / 2025

Case between Kunjan vs Thomas regarding injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt.Sirsha N.A
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kunjan is the plaintiff seeking an ad-interim injunction against Thomas, the defendant. The injunction aims to prevent the defendant from encroaching on or destroying the agricultural land.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's property. This injunction is aimed at protecting the plaintiff from irreparable injury.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's property. This injunction is aimed at protecting the plaintiff from irreparable injury.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim exparte injunction order is passed as follows: The defendant / respondent or his men and agents is temporarily restrain from encroaching on or cutting into the existing boundary of the Petition A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunjan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thomas
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit and other documents produced by the plaintiff.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayasankar G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjusha Ajayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gopika Gokul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.N.Jayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim ex-parte injunction against the defendant restraining from encroaching on or cutting into the existing boundary of the property.
Evidence:
an ad-interim exparte injunction order is passed as follows: The defendant / respondent or his men and agents is temporarily restrain from encroaching on or cutting into the existing boundary of the Petition A schedule property

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunjan vs Thomas regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kunjan vs Thomas regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won