Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 72 OF 2015

Case between Kunheethutty et al vs Rafeekh regarding eviction

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-08-03
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Fri, 08/03/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners, the children of Mundekkattu Kunhimoideen Haji, filed an eviction petition against Rafeekh to the Rent Controller of Tirur under the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the eviction petition and accepted the terms of the compromise, forming part of the order, under the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction
Case Type
Eviction under Rent Control Act
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the eviction petition and accepted the terms of the compromise, forming part of the order, under the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The terms of the compromise petition is lawful. Compromise petition is accepted and the RCP is allowed and the terms of the compromise shall form part of the order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunheethutty
Party Age
60
Relation
Child of Mundekkattu Kunhimoideen Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammedkutty
Party Age
54
Relation
Child of Mundekkattu Kunhimoideen Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mariyamu
Party Age
50
Relation
Child of Mundekkattu Kunhimoideen Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdurahiman
Party Age
48
Relation
Child of Mundekkattu Kunhimoideen Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Musthafa
Party Age
42
Relation
Child of Mundekkattu Kunhimoideen Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rafeekh
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o Abdurahiman
Plaintiffs Documents
IA 1761/2018 - Compromise petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vipin Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.R.Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent.
Evidence:
The terms of the compromise petition is lawful. Compromise petition is accepted and the RCP is allowed and the terms of the compromise shall form part of the order.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawful terms of the compromise petition.
Reference:
IA 1761/2018

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction under Rent Control Act
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Eviction under Rent Control Act
Case Code
Case between Kunheethutty et al vs Rafeekh regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Kunheethutty et al vs Rafeekh regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/03/2018 - 12:00
From
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Puliyakkathodi Koitha et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Property Delivery Plaintiff Won
Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Musthafa et al regarding petition delivery and closure
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Execution Petition Not mentioned
Case between Kuathakath Kader Javid vs Kuttyamakkanakath Shajida regarding decree execution
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Proceedings Plaintiff Won
Case between Pelayam Parmabil Hamza and Kunhikrishnan et al regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Ahammedkutty vs Regional Manager et al regarding eviction for supermarket business
Rent Controller of Tirur
Eviction under Rent Control Act Plaintiff Won