Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.127/2022

Case between K.Surendran Nair et al vs V.N.Venugopal et al regarding suit dismissed for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-07-07
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 07/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.Surendran Nair and others, were involved in a suit against the defendants, V.N.Venugopal and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file a proof affidavit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file necessary documents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file necessary documents.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present nor represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present nor represented. Plaintiff not filed proof affidavit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Surendran Nair
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arun S Nair
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anil S.Nair
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.N.Venugopal
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jancy George
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahim V.K
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.K. Sasi
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Raji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.S.Renjith
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff not present or represented.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present nor represented. Plaintiff not filed proof affidavit. Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.Surendran Nair et al vs V.N.Venugopal et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between K.Surendran Nair et al vs V.N.Venugopal et al regarding suit dismissed for default.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 07/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George vs Mary regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won