Case Summary
K.R.Vasudevan is the plaintiff who was absent during the hearing, while the defendant Binoy Simmi Vinay was represented. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case because the plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.R.Vasudevan
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binoy Simmi Vinay @ Bony
- Party Age
- 47
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Innocent Francis Papali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.N.Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sareena George P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.R.Vasudevan vs Binoy Simmi Vinay regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between K.R.Vasudevan vs Binoy Simmi Vinay regarding suit dismissal for default