Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 343/2018

Case between Krishnan et al vs Balan regarding property transfer

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Krishnan and Sudharmma, have filed a suit against the defendant, Balan, regarding the transfer of property. The parties reached a joint compromise, leading to the court's decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted a joint compromise petition from both parties regarding the property transfer. A decree was passed reflecting their mutual agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Transfer of property as per the compromise agreement
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted a joint compromise petition from both parties regarding the property transfer. A decree was passed reflecting their mutual agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful and agreed upon by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful and agreed upon by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the compromise are found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Accordingly, on the basis of the compromise the decree in suit and counterclaim is passed as follows: The Defendant has agreed to transfer/convey to the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiffs have agreed to purchase, the property described in Schedule B of the plaint, which includes a well as specified along with the attached survey sketch.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishnan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudharmma
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hazeemkhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Samben
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. A. Bijoykumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The decree in suit and counterclaim is passed based on the compromise.
Evidence:
Accordingly, on the basis of the compromise the decree in suit and counterclaim is passed as follows.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint Compromise Petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court found the terms of the compromise to be lawful and based its judgment on it.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnan et al vs Balan regarding property transfer
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnan et al vs Balan regarding property transfer

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won