Case Summary
The plaintiff, Krishnamritha V, brought a suit against multiple defendants concerning unspecified grievances. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to present evidence and showed no intention to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit.
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit.
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders shall stand vacated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishnamritha V
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chairperson, College Union
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chairman, Students Grievance Committee
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Program Committee General Convener
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State represented by District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Biju K Chacko
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnamritha V vs Chairperson, College Union et al regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnamritha V vs Chairperson, College Union et al regarding suit dismissal