Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1663/2025

Case between K.Padmaja Devi vs Gopakumaran Nair regarding mediation settlement

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.Padmaja Devi and Gopakumaran Nair were involved in a legal dispute that was resolved through mediation. The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in accordance with it.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that both parties represented themselves adequately. The matter was settled through mediation, which the court accepted.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that both parties represented themselves adequately. The matter was settled through mediation, which the court accepted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Matter settled on Mediation and accepted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Matter settled on Mediation and accepted.
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled on Mediation and accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in merits of Mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Padmaja Devi
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopakumaran Nair
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Promissory note, Hire purchase Agreement, Statement of Account, Coy of Advocate notice, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.Premkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jaideep.G.Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was decreed in merits of the mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in merits of Mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidences considered in the mediation settlement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Hire Purchase Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidences considered in the mediation settlement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidences considered in the mediation settlement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Coy of Advocate notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidences considered in the mediation settlement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidences considered in the mediation settlement.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.Padmaja Devi vs Gopakumaran Nair regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between K.Padmaja Devi vs Gopakumaran Nair regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won