Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 299/2017

Case between K.P Surendran Pillai vs Maya et al regarding execution of a decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration
approximately-7 years 2 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.P Surendran Pillai has filed an execution petition against Maya and others to construct a compound wall to prevent violations of a previous decree. The court found that the execution petition was not maintainable due to the lack of necessary documentation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition is dismissed as it is not maintainable due to the absence of a Survey Commission Report and necessary documentation for execution.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition is dismissed as it is not maintainable due to the absence of a Survey Commission Report and necessary documentation for execution.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition lacked necessary documentation such as a Survey Commission Report.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The Decree Holder has no cases that the boundary between the Decree Holder and the Judgment Debtors were fixed during trial stage. There is no mode of execution seen sought in the execution petition under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment Evidence:

In these circumstances, the execution petition is not maintainable. Hence, dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.P Surendran Pillai
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Maya
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leela Pillai
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nanda Gopal
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pathmavathy Amma
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Syam Prakash.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Permission to construct a compound wall on the eastern and northern sides of the decree schedule property.
Evidence:
In these circumstances, the execution petition is not maintainable.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.P Surendran Pillai vs Maya et al regarding execution of a decree
Case Code Year
Case between K.P Surendran Pillai vs Maya et al regarding execution of a decree

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 10/05/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Prakash vs Sajitha et al regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd et al vs Girija et al regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between L.Ashok et al vs B.Vinod regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K.M.Syam Mohan vs Nishad regarding Execution Petition
THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Nikhil.S.Jobin et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won