Case Summary
K.K.Mohankumar filed a suit against A.D.Gopalashenoy for a permanent prohibitory injunction concerning the construction of a compound wall on the property boundaries. The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit as there was no obstruction from the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed since the plaintiff reported no obstruction in construction. Each party is to bear their own costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the case due to lack of obstruction.
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the case due to lack of obstruction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the case due to lack of obstruction.
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the case due to lack of obstruction.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo and stated that no obstruction from the side of defendant or anybody in constructing compound wall on the boundaries of plaint A schedule property and hence the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.K.Mohankumar
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.D.Gopalashenoy
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sabu Thozuppadan.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Devi.P.Prathapan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajwin.P.Lalson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anooj.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.K.Mohankumar vs A.D.Gopalashenoy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between K.K.Mohankumar vs A.D.Gopalashenoy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction