Case Summary
K.K.Haridasan filed a suit against Baijumon. Both the plaintiff and defendant were absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as both parties were absent.
The suit was dismissed as both parties were absent.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as both parties were absent.
The suit was dismissed as both parties were absent.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed as both parties were absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.K.Haridasan
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o late Kochakkan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baijumon
- Relation
- S/o Raman
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Blessy Mol P.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.V.Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.K.Haridasan vs Baijumon regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between K.K.Haridasan vs Baijumon regarding dismissal for default