Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1105/2019

Case between K.K. Abdul Jamal vs Legha Ramesh regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-04-08
Duration
approximately-4 years 10 months
Case Closed
Mon, 04/08/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.K. Abdul Jamal, the plaintiff, is seeking payment of Rs.51,918 with interest from Legha Ramesh. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to pay for goods purchased on credit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.51,918 along with interest as specified. The defendant is also liable for the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay Rs.51,918 along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.51,918 along with interest as specified. The defendant is also liable for the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case through proper accounts and unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case through proper accounts and unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The same would show that defendant purchased goods from plaintiff for Rs.40,881 on 01.05.2017. On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.51,918 with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.51,918 (Rupees Fifty one thousand, nine hundred and eighteen only) along with interest @12% from 16.08.2019 till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.K. Abdul Jamal
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Legha Ramesh
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoice No.173 for Rs.40,881, Copy of Ledger Account Statement, Office copy of Demand lawyer notice, Original Postal cover returned unclaimed, Certificate under Section 65 B of the Evidence Act
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.51,918 with interest from defendant.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum from 16.08.2019 till the date of decree, and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant and her assets shall be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendant and her assets shall be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice No.173 for Rs.40,881 dated 01.05.2017 issued by plaintiff to defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of ledger account statement showing purchase of goods from plaintiff by defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice dated 17.06.2019 issued to defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Article
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned postal article related to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate under Section 65 B of the Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between K.K. Abdul Jamal vs Legha Ramesh regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between K.K. Abdul Jamal vs Legha Ramesh regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 05/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 04/08/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won