OS. No. 808/2018

Case between K.Indira et al vs Anuja. S@ Thankachi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court

COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-08-11

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.Indira and Harilal, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The defendants included Anuja. S@ Thankachi, Siromany, and Sarojam.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The plaintiffs were absent and no representation was made on their behalf, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff absent and no representation leading to default dismissal.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff absent and no representation leading to default dismissal.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.Indira
Party Age: 70
Relation: W/o Late Gopinathan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Harilal
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o Late Gopinathan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anuja. S@ Thankachi
Party Age: 37

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Siromany
Party Age: 65

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sarojam
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o. Siromany

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Stevenson
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: N. R. Roy
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Permanent prohibitory injunction

Evidence:

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification