Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by K.H.Balachandra Shenoy, sought to proceed with their suit, but were unable to present evidence due to absences. The court dismissed the suit for lack of readiness from the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs were dismissed due to their failure to present evidence, resulting in the dismissal of their suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate readiness to proceed with the case.
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate readiness to proceed with the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate readiness to proceed with the case.
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate readiness to proceed with the case.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was again posted to this date for evidence. Plaintiff not ready to adduce today also.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, IA 10/25 is dismissed. Accordingly suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.H.Balachandra Shenoy
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.K.Vedavyas
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R.Ramnath
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivananda Pai @ Raghavendra Thirtha
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N.K.Prabhakara Naik
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.Rajkumar Kamath
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- G.Retnakara Prabhu
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.K.Chanrasekhara Prabhu
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh R Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ratheesh M.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.R.Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rishikesh Shenoy M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Madathimalil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vivek Bhat
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prasanthkumar S.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ashok B Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.V.George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.S.Gireesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.N.Rajagopalan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Riyal Devassy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
IA 10/25 filed by the counsel for the plaintiffs seeking to remove the suit from the list.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 10/25 is dismissed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, I find no bonafides on the part of the plaintiff. Hence, IA 10/25 is dismissed. Accordingly suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.H.Balachandra Shenoy et al vs Sivananda Pai @ Raghavendra Thirtha et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between K.H.Balachandra Shenoy et al vs Sivananda Pai @ Raghavendra Thirtha et al regarding dismissal for default.