Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1175/2024

Case between Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society et al vs Ajithkumar G et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-11-14
Duration
Case Code No.
1175
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition for a temporary injunction filed by the Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society and others against Ajithkumar G and others. The court granted an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' authority and functioning in the society.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction favoring the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from interfering in the operations of the society. The order was made to protect the rights of the plaintiffs while the case is ongoing.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering or obstructing the plaintiffs' functioning in the society.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction favoring the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from interfering in the operations of the society. The order was made to protect the rights of the plaintiffs while the case is ongoing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioners made out a prima facie case and that there was a likelihood of irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioners.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents and person under them from interfering or obstructing the 2nd to 4th plaintiff in the matter of their right and authority and functioning as President, Secretary and Treasurer of the 1st plaintiff society.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. R Rajeev
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K B Manilal
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C A Rajesh
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajithkumar G
Party Age
50
Relation
Father's name not known to the plaintiffs
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K H Mary Das
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad John
Party Age
54
Relation
Father's name not known to the plaintiffs
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Susanth Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sidharth O
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Albin A Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nekha Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents and person under them from interfering or obstructing the 2nd to 4th plaintiff in the matter of their right and authority and functioning as President, Secretary and Treasurer of the 1st plaintiff society.
Evidence:
an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents and person under them from interfering or obstructing the 2nd to 4th plaintiff in the matter of their right and authority and functioning as President, Secretary and Treasurer of the 1st plaintiff society and restraining them from reconvening meetings of the 1st plaintiff society and manage the accounts of the 1st plaintiff society maintained at Kerala Bank and Bank of Baroda, Vyttila Branch until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won