Case Summary
The plaintiff is Kavitha.O and the defendants are K.G.Vishnu Lal and Rejani Vishnu Lal. The case is about a suit filed by the plaintiff for a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent, suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kavitha.O
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.G.Vishnu Lal
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rejani Vishnu Lal
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mangad S.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B.K.Jayamohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Babu.D.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit is filed by the plaintiff for Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent, suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kavitha.O vs K.G.Vishnu Lal et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kavitha.O vs K.G.Vishnu Lal et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction