Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 210/2023

Case between The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. vs Praveen Dekkar et al regarding court fee balance and suit rejection

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. as the plaintiff and Praveen Dekkar along with Mrs. Ambily Rajan as defendants. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the court dismissed the suit due to unpaid court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation present. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the required balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation present. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the required balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence and non-payment of court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence and non-payment of court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant exparte. Balance Court Fee not paid.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 04.11.2024 and the court on the same day delivered the following:- Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant exparte. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praveen Dekkar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs, Ambily Rajan
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajitha S Dharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Madhusoodhanan S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rohini V Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lipimol G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Archana V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reshma Pushpangadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sooraj M.I
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ganga Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. vs Praveen Dekkar et al regarding court fee balance and suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. vs Praveen Dekkar et al regarding court fee balance and suit rejection

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won