Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 151/2024

Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Ashina Subaida regarding Default Dismissal

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Karthika Pradeep filed a suit against Ashina Subaida. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent for the hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the case for default due to lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent for the hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the case for default due to lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for Default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karthika Pradeep
Party Age
24
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashina Subaida
Party Age
23
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arya M.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anju Dileep
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nidhin K.N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neeraj T.N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ambadi Murali
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gopikrishnan R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soorya S Shenoy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for Default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Ashina Subaida regarding Default Dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Ashina Subaida regarding Default Dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won