Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 421/2023

Case between Kaniyari Parambil Navala et al vs Asees Rahman P.K. et al regarding fixation of boundary

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Kaniyari Parambil Navala and other plaintiffs seeking to fix the boundaries of a property claimed to be in their possession. The defendants, Asees Rahman P.K. and Ussain Haji, were absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found no merit in the plaintiffs' suit for fixation of boundaries and dismissed it.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found no merit in the plaintiffs' suit for fixation of boundaries and dismissed it.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to establish a cause of action against the defendants.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to establish a cause of action against the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that there is no relief sought against the defendants and no claim of right over the property was made against them.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is dismissed without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kaniyari Parambil Navala
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kaniyari Parambil Nasareena
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kaniyari Parambil Nishada
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kaniyari Parambil Najira
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kaniyari Parambil Nubida
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kaniyari Parambil Eassakoya
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Puthiyamaliyekkal Sainabi
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asees Rahman P.K.
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ussain Haji
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Gift deed No.969/1966, Joint Release Deed No.986/1966, Kanam Assignment Deed No: 585/1975, Joint Release Deed No: 812/1975, Settlement Deed No: 2090/2000, Survey Plan submitted by Nishad P.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Muhammed Haneef
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs sought a decree for the fixation of boundaries of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The suit is one for fixation of boundaries of the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Gift deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is relevant as it establishes the transfer of property rights to Pathummakutty.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Joint Release Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the transfer of rights over the property from Imbichikoya and others to Pathummakutty and others.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of the Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document signifies the assignment of rights in favor of Eassakoya.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Joint Release Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the transfer of rights from Abdul Kareem to Eassakoya.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the settlement of property rights in favor of Navala and others.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Survey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is relevant for the measurement and delineation of the plaint schedule property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report provides the findings of the advocate commissioner regarding the property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document presents the actual plan submitted by the land surveyor for the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kaniyari Parambil Navala et al vs Asees Rahman P.K. et al regarding fixation of boundary
Case Code Year
Case between Kaniyari Parambil Navala et al vs Asees Rahman P.K. et al regarding fixation of boundary

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 04/09/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won