Case Summary
The petition involves Kalikutty Gopalan and Thankamma Raju as applicants against Subhadra and others concerning delivery proceedings. The court found no grounds to keep the delivery proceedings in abeyance and dismissed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for lack of sufficient grounds to keep the delivery proceedings abeyance.
Key Reasoning:
No stay order was produced, hence the court found no grounds for abeyance.
No stay order was produced, hence the court found no grounds for abeyance.
Why Defendant Won:
No stay order was produced, hence the court found no grounds for abeyance.
No stay order was produced, hence the court found no grounds for abeyance.
Supporting Evidence
No stay order seen produced. So, in the absence of any stay order, there is no ground to keep the delivery proceedings in abeyance.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, this petition stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kalikutty Gopalan
- Party Age
- 81
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamma Raju
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subhadra
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambika
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayyappan
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepa K.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Thariyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ambily E.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G. Govindan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.A. Kadher Kunju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sidheek A.M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Hashim Althaf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition to keep the delivery proceedings in abeyance was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, this petition stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kalikutty Gopalan et al vs Subhadra et al regarding delivery proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between Kalikutty Gopalan et al vs Subhadra et al regarding delivery proceedings