RENT CONTROL PETITION Nos.6 OF 2015

Case between Kakkadavath Leela vs Sameer.K.M. et al regarding eviction petition

Court

Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-09-27

Duration

2 years

Case Closed

Wed, 09/27/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks eviction of respondents from a rented property due to bonafide need for petitioner's husband to start a garment business. Respondents contest subletting claims and challenge bonafide need projected by the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

Petition allowed for eviction under Section 11(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Respondents directed to provide vacant possession of the property to the petitioner within three months.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Eviction

Case Type

Rent Control Petition - Eviction

Final Judgment

Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioner's bonafide need for the property for setting up a garment business by the petitioner's dependent husband as genuine and upheld the claim for eviction under Section 11(3).

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Petitioner's bonafide need for the property for setting up a garment business by the petitioner's dependent husband was upheld.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed under S.11(3). The respondents shall pay the costs of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kakkadavath Leela
Party Age: 50
Relation: Daughter of Ambadi

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sameer.K.M.
Party Age: 38
Relation: Son of Sakkariya

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Palamparambil Abdulsamad
Party Age: 46
Relation: Son of Kunhibava

Plaintiffs Documents

Copy of Lawyer notice, Postal receipt, A/D Card, Reply Notice

Defendants Documents

Discharge Summary, Prescription, Medical Certificate

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Petitioners allowed eviction of respondents from the property in question.

Evidence:

Petition is allowed under S.11(3). The respondents shall pay the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Communication of termination of tenancy to the respondents.

Reference:

A1(a)

Document Type: Discharge Summary

Submitted By: Defendant