Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 358 OF 2015

Case between Kadiyamu vs Saidalavi Haji et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-08-04
Duration
2 years
Case Closed
Sat, 08/04/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Kadiyamu filed a suit for injunction against defendants Saidalavi Haji, Pathumma, P.K.Abdul Razak and Rumanath. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. Plaintiff not present. Today posted for plaintiff's evidence. D1 present. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kadiyamu
Party Age
65
Relation
Daughter of Kunhahammed kutty Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saidalavi Haji
Party Age
67
Relation
Son of Kunhikoyamu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pathumma
Party Age
60
Relation
Wife of Saidalavi Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.K.Abdul Razak
Relation
Son of Muhammed @ Kunhappu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rumanath Haji
Relation
Daughter of Saidalavi Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.Abdul Kadar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.A.Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought injunction against defendants
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Plaintiff not present. Today posted for plaintiff's evidence. D1 present. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kadiyamu vs Saidalavi Haji et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kadiyamu vs Saidalavi Haji et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 08/04/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/04/2018 - 12:00
From
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won