Case Summary
The plaintiff, Kabeerkutty, filed a suit for the realisation of money against the defendant, Sujith Surendran. Both parties were represented in court, and the case was heard on August 12, 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's case as both sides were absent and the required court fee was not remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not comply with the previous court order regarding the remittance of the court fee.
The plaintiff did not comply with the previous court order regarding the remittance of the court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not comply with the previous court order regarding the remittance of the court fee.
The plaintiff did not comply with the previous court order regarding the remittance of the court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not comply with the previous court order regarding the remittance of the court fee.
Judgment Evidence:
Both sides absent, represented. BCF not remitted. Not comply order dated 2/8/2025. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kabeerkutty
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujith Surendran
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. Ziad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Vimal Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Kabeerkutty vs Sujith Surendran regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kabeerkutty vs Sujith Surendran regarding realisation of money