Case Summary
K.A. Salim is the plaintiff in this case against Leena Joy and another defendant regarding a legal suit. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No Proof Affidavit seen filed. No petition also seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.A. Salim
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leena Joy
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joy
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sibi Karun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.B. Dayal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.A. Joseph Manavalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.A. Salim vs Leena Joy et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between K.A. Salim vs Leena Joy et al regarding default dismissal of suit