Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1284/2024

Case between K. Aravindakshan Nair et al vs Jayan T.V. regarding a civil suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-19
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 07/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K. Aravindakshan Nair and Valsala Kumari Pillai, are involved in a civil suit against the defendant Jayan T.V. Both parties were repeatedly absent without representation, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the continuous absence of both parties without representation.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the continuous absence of both parties without representation.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Aravindakshan Nair
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valsala Kumari Pillai
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayan T.V.
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. S Manu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dilu Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.A Anupaman
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.B Sivaprasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Neethu K. Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vijaykumar C.Y
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju E.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anandhu Satheesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dainy Davis
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rilna Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jaleel Valley
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreejith P. V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K. Aravindakshan Nair et al vs Jayan T.V. regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between K. Aravindakshan Nair et al vs Jayan T.V. regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 07/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won