Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 323/2024

Case between Justin vs Lillykutty regarding setting aside the Cancellation Deed and Permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-01
Duration
approximately-1 year 17 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Justin filed a suit against his elder sister Lillykutty to set aside a cancellation deed and obtain a permanent injunction. The plaintiff claims that the cancellation deed was executed fraudulently by the defendant, attempting to regain possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, setting aside the cancellation deed and permanently restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Cancellation of deed No. 1249/2011 and permanent injunction against the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, setting aside the cancellation deed and permanently restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The cancellation deed was found to be executed fraudulently and unilaterally, violating legal standards regarding property rights.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The cancellation deed was found to be executed fraudulently and unilaterally, violating legal standards regarding property rights.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with the evidence of PW2 and Exts. A1 to A4 and A6 documents would prove the case of the plaintiff. The evidence adduced by the plaintiffs evince that the apprehension of the plaintiffs regarding the trespass over the plaint schedule property ... is genuine.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Cancellation deed No. 1249/2011 dated 05/04/2011 of Kundara SRO is hereby set aside. 2. The defendant is permanently restrained from entering into the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Justin
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lillykutty
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Deed No. 898/1992, Settlement Deed No. 3608/2009, Release Deed No. 2839/2010, Release Deed No. 497/2011, Encumbrance Certificate dated 05/04/2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prakash Sathyanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is permanently restrained from entering and making alterations to the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is permanently restrained from entering into the plaint schedule property or subletting the plaint schedule property to others and making any kind of alterations or doing any other acts of waste to the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Cancellation deed No. 1249/2011 dated 05/04/2011 is set aside.
Evidence:
Cancellation deed No. 1249/2011 dated 05/04/2011 of Kundara SRO is hereby set aside.
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's ownership and rights over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further consolidates the plaintiff's claim to the property by detailing rights inherited through their mother.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the defendant voluntarily relinquished her share of the property to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This second release deed highlights additional rights obtained by the plaintiff from other siblings regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report provides evidence that the plaint schedule properties exist within well-defined boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate supports the plaintiff's claim regarding clear title and absence of encumbrances on the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Justin vs Lillykutty regarding setting aside the Cancellation Deed and Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Justin vs Lillykutty regarding setting aside the Cancellation Deed and Permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won