Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 197/2022

Case between Joyce vs Leelamary regarding Fixation of Boundary, Declaration, Recovery of Possession and Injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-09-10
Duration
Case Code No.
197
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff Joyce against the defendant Leelamary for matters related to boundary fixation and possession recovery. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and the balance court fee not being remitted.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and the balance court fee not being remitted.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and the balance court fee not being remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected U/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joyce
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leelamary
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.S.Anuraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jasmine.M.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought injunction as part of the suit.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff u/s. 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Fixation of Boundary, Declaration, Recovery of Possession and Injunction.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought a declaration as part of the suit.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff u/s. 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Fixation of Boundary, Declaration, Recovery of Possession and Injunction.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of possession as part of the suit.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff u/s. 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Fixation of Boundary, Declaration, Recovery of Possession and Injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won