Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 898/2021

Case between Joy P T vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding suit rejection due to non-remittance of court fee

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-11-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff Joy P T and defendant Sudheesh Kumar regarding a civil suit. The suit was rejected by the court due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the required court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the court fee, despite being given several chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the court fee, despite being given several chances.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joy P T
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudheesh Kumar
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V A Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Eldho Cherian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju Wahab
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sachin Jacob Ambat
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Cyriac Tom
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T A Kader Kunju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted so far despite giving several chances. Hence suit is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joy P T vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding suit rejection due to non-remittance of court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Joy P T vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding suit rejection due to non-remittance of court fee

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won