Case Summary
Joseph, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against George and others, who are the defendants. The case was heard on November 17, 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was called absent.
The plaintiff was called absent.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel submitted that no instruction from plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joseph
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o.late Niklose Fernandez
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- George
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o.late Niklose Fernandez
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manual
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o.late Niklose Fernandez
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lawrence
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o.Niklose Fernandez
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Baiju Kumar. D.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Deepa .P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default, thus the injunction relief was not granted.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Joseph vs George et al regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Joseph vs George et al regarding injunction.