Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 250/2019

Case between Joseph @ Jose et al vs Paulose et al regarding compromise agreement

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph @ Jose and Annakutty are plaintiffs in this case against Paulose and Shiju. The suit pertains to a compromise agreement that was heard and accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise agreement filed by the parties. The suit was decreed according to the terms of this agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise agreement filed by the parties. The suit was decreed according to the terms of this agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the compromise agreement to be lawful and accepted it.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the compromise agreement to be lawful and accepted it.
Supporting Evidence
The court accepted the compromise agreement filed by the parties, finding it to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise agreement. Compromise agreement shall do form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph @ Jose
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Annakutty
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paulose
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joswin Thampi Kunnath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.T. Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Compromise agreement filed, accepted being lawful. Suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joseph @ Jose et al vs Paulose et al regarding compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Joseph @ Jose et al vs Paulose et al regarding compromise agreement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
PERUMBAVOOR
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won