Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 548/2025

Case between Joseph D. Fernandez vs A. Ajikumar, B. Vijayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Joseph D. Fernandez as the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants A. Ajikumar and B. Vijayakumar. The matter was settled between the parties in a mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms. The parties settled the matter in mediation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fees paid by the Plaintiff be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms. The parties settled the matter in mediation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph D. Fernandez
Party Age
87
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A. Ajikumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B. Vijayakumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Madhsudhan. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs. Vinu Karunakaran & Anandhalekshmi. V. L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise.
Evidence:
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joseph D. Fernandez vs A. Ajikumar, B. Vijayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Joseph D. Fernandez vs A. Ajikumar, B. Vijayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won