Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1356/2014

Case between Joseph Cliness et al vs Karalin @ Karali Fernandez et al regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-11 years 5 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Joseph Cliness and Lenita Cliness, seek a declaration of title and recovery of possession of property from the defendant, Karalin. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant was a caretaker permitted to reside on the property but has now unlawfully occupied it and made illegal constructions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them title and possession of the property. The defendant is ordered to vacate the property and is restrained from making any further constructions.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of title, recovery of possession, and mesne profits at the rate of Rs.1000/- per month from 15/12/2013.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them title and possession of the property. The defendant is ordered to vacate the property and is restrained from making any further constructions.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their title and possession over the property with sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their title and possession over the property with sufficient evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs demonstrated their ownership and continuous possession of the property, and the defendant failed to substantiate her claims with evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed as follows: 1) It is held that plaintiffs have title and possession over plaint A schedule property. 2) The defendant is directed to vacate plaint B schedule property and put the plaintiffs in the vacant possession of the building within 4 months from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph Cliness
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lenita Cliness
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karalin @ Karali Fernandez
Party Age
80
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Benny Pereira
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jespin Lawrence
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Benedicta
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini Benny
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Gift Deed No.504/1990, Settlement Deed No.5159/2006, Tax Receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R.S. Kalkura
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S.Kalkura
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Beyline Das.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of plaintiffs' right, title and interest over the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
It is held that plaintiffs have title and possession over plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of vacant possession of plaint B schedule property from the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to vacate plaint B schedule property and put the plaintiffs in the vacant possession of the building within 4 months from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Mesne profits at the rate of Rs.1000/- per month from 15/12/2013 till date of recovery.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realise mesne profits at the rate of Rs.1000/- per month 15/12/2013 till handing over the vacant possession of the plaint B schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraint on the defendant from creating any documents detrimental to the interest of the plaintiff on the property.
Evidence:
The defendant is restrained from creating any documents, detrimental to the interest of the plaintiff on the property.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Gift deed No.1394/1998, Dhananichayam deed No.366/2000 and Sale deed No.2823/2006 are declared null and void.
Evidence:
The Gift deed No.1394/1998, Dhananichayam deed No.366/2000 and Sale deed No.2823/2006 are declared null and void.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Patta Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the title of the plaintiffs over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: English School Leaving Certificate Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the identity and lineage of the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Pension Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the claim of ownership and connection to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the tax payments made by the plaintiffs on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the tax payments made by the plaintiffs on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the tax payments made by the plaintiffs on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4(b)
Document Type: Original Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the transfer of property to the second plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences a settlement deed executed by the second plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the sale of property to the second plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Original Settlement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences a settlement deed executed in favor of plaintiff no. 1.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the recent tax payments made by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the recent tax payments made by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A9(a)
Document Type: Revenue List Pertaining To Properties
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document lists the properties associated with the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Certified Copy of Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is referenced to challenge the claim of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Application Filed By Defendant No.1
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the defendant's attempt to claim unauthorized property.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Application Filed By Defendant No.1
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the defendant's attempt to claim unauthorized property.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Certificate Issued By Muttathara Village Office
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the defendant's claims to property.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Relevant Extract of The Thandapper Account of Property Comprised In Survey No.2919/B-2-1
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiffs' ownership claims.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Notice Issued By Corporation Of Thiruvananthapuram to Defendant No.1
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is related to the illegal constructions by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Notice Issued By Corporation Thiruvananthapuram
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is related to the illegal constructions by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Notice Issued By Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is related to the illegal constructions and denial of application.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Certified Copy of Caveat Filed By Defendant No.1
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is referenced to indicate the defendant's response to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document assists in understanding the details and extent of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This plan illustrates the layout and boundaries of the properties involved.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joseph Cliness et al vs Karalin @ Karali Fernandez et al regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession
Case Code Year
Case between Joseph Cliness et al vs Karalin @ Karali Fernandez et al regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 12/20/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won