Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 870 /20 21

Case between Joselin Peter vs George Joviet et al regarding refund of court fees

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joselin Peter filed a petition seeking the refund of court fees paid and the return of documents as the plaint is to be rejected. The court reviewed the case and found the contentions tenable.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the petition for the refund of court fees and return of documents to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee paid and return of documents
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the petition for the refund of court fees and return of documents to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The contentions in the affidavit were found to be tenable.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the contentions in the affidavit are tenable and petitions is to be allowed in the interest of justice.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is allowed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joselin Peter
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Joviet
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vazhakkala Kuri Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Judgments in 2018(1)KHC 164 & 2023(1)KHC 352
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vasudevan S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jomon P Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K B Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Refund of court fees and return of documents to the petitioner.
Evidence:
office is directed to refund the court fee paid by plaintiff under section 70 of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act and also to return the documents as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referenced judgments to support its decision to allow the petition.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joselin Peter vs George Joviet et al regarding refund of court fees
Case Code Year
Case between Joselin Peter vs George Joviet et al regarding refund of court fees

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/17/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won