Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.870/2021

Case between Joselin Peter vs George Joviet et al regarding civil suit

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joselin Peter filed a civil suit against George Joviet and M/s Vazhakkala Kuries Pvt. Ltd. The court found that the plaint is barred by law and rejected the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the suit was rejected because the plaint was barred by law and ordered a refund of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Refund of court fees and return of documents produced
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the suit was rejected because the plaint was barred by law and ordered a refund of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was barred by law as per the existing legal provisions.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was barred by law as per the existing legal provisions.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the plaint is barred by law.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joselin Peter
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Joviet
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Vazhakkala Kuries Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vasudevan S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K B Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jomon P Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Satisfied that the plaint is barred by law. Hence I A 7/24 is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joselin Peter vs George Joviet et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Joselin Peter vs George Joviet et al regarding civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won