Case Summary
The plaintiff, Jose, aged 76, filed a suit against the defendant, Benny, aged 52. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff submitted no instruction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff failed to provide instructions.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to non-appearance of the plaintiff.
The suit was dismissed due to non-appearance of the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to non-appearance of the plaintiff.
The suit was dismissed due to non-appearance of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff submitted no instruction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jose
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Benny
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.S.Renjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D.Subhashchandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no instruction submitted by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jose vs Benny regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Jose vs Benny regarding dismissal for default.