O.S No. 937/2018

Case between Jose Varghese vs Smt. Eliamma Varghese regarding suit rejection.

Court

THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-07-28

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 07/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jose Varghese, filed a suit against the defendant, Smt. Eliamma Varghese. The court rejected the suit due to non-payment of court fees and the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the suit as the plaintiff failed to pay the required court fees and was not present during the hearing.

Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and pay court fees.

Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and pay court fees.

Supporting Evidence

Balance Court Fee not paid. More than one month passed since framing of issues. Counsel for plaintiff submits no instructions. Plaintiff not present.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 28th day of July, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Jose Varghese
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Smt. Eliamma Varghese
Party Age: 65
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Nandakumar A
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P. R Ashok kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Suit rejected due to balance court fee not paid and plaintiff not present.

Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not paid. More than one month passed since framing of issues. Counsel for plaintiff submits no instructions. Plaintiff not present and Balance Court Fee not paid. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification