Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by the defendant Treasa Lopez seeking to recall a witness (DW1) in relation to evidence and documents. The plaintiffs, represented by John Lopez's family, oppose the petition, stating that the defendant lacks the standing to recall the witness.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to recall the witness was dismissed by the court due to lack of merit and appropriate justification. The court affirmed that the order of dismissal was consistent with procedural rules.
Key Reasoning:
The court found insufficient justification from the defendant to recall the witness.
The court found insufficient justification from the defendant to recall the witness.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is no proper reason made out to recall DW1 in the petition at hand.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA stands dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- John Lopez
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mercy Lopez @ Prasteena Mercy Lopez
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Christopher Lopez
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Antony Jenson Lopez
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jency Lopez
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Treasa Lopez
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shibu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Drisya Kamal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anoop M.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Princy Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Tintu K.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sruthy R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sanu S. Malakeel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rahul A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jeffin John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anupama R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jijo Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aneesh James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.D Beena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The defendant's petition seeking to recall DW1
Evidence:
Hence, the averment mentioned in the petition herein seeking to recall the DW1 is one without any merits.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between John Lopez et al vs Treasa Lopez regarding recalling DW1.
Case Code Year
Case between John Lopez et al vs Treasa Lopez regarding recalling DW1.