Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1451/2020

Case between John Antony Rodricks vs Gladys Rodricks et al regarding compromise petition

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

John Antony Rodricks filed a suit against Gladys Rodricks and others. The case was heard and a compromise petition was accepted.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties and decreed the suit based on the agreed terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties and decreed the suit based on the agreed terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court accepted the terms of the compromise petition as lawful and signed by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms lawful and signed by both parties and counsels concerned.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence accepted. Suit decreed in terms of compromise petition. It shall from part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
John Antony Rodricks
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gladys Rodricks
Party Age
82
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph Paul Rodricks
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jean Auxilia Rodricks
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Julia Mona Rodricks
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jessel Vinohar Rodricks
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.K. Radhakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Thirumala P.K.Mani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Chandrapraveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise petition.
Evidence:
Hence accepted. Suit decreed in terms of compromise petition. It shall from part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the compromise petition which was filed by both parties.
Reference:
IA 5/24

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between John Antony Rodricks vs Gladys Rodricks et al regarding compromise petition
Case Code Year
Case between John Antony Rodricks vs Gladys Rodricks et al regarding compromise petition

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won