Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by Thankappan and B.S. Babu challenging a prior order. The court conducted a final hearing and passed an order regarding the costs and memo.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed was allowed and the costs were directed to be paid as per the court's decision.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was allowed as both sides were represented and costs were paid.
The petition was allowed as both sides were represented and costs were paid.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was allowed as both sides were represented and costs were paid.
The petition was allowed as both sides were represented and costs were paid.
Supporting Evidence
IA allowed. Costs paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced by me in open court on this the 10th day of October, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jith Kumar.B
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankappan
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B.S. Babu @Ani
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
NIL
Defendants Documents
NIL
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D.B. Ajayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jith Kumar.B vs Thankappan et al regarding RP filed under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC
Case Code Year
Case between Jith Kumar.B vs Thankappan et al regarding RP filed under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC