Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 323/2024

Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jigsy Joy filed a suit against Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Akhil regarding a mediation agreement. The court found the terms of the mediation lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit based on the lawful terms of a mediation agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of Court fee as per Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit based on the lawful terms of a mediation agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jigsy Joy
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akhil
Relation
Location Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
N/A
Defendants Documents
N/A

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jeejan T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Mediation report received as settled. Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court fee as per Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Jigsy Joy vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited et al regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won