Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1041/2020

Case between Jessy Joseph vs Mathew George, Vakayil Francis Pious, JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Jessy Joseph as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Mathew George and Vakayil Francis Pious. The suit was dismissed for default due to the repeated absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's repeated absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's repeated absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me, in the Open court on this the 22nd day of March, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jessy Joseph
Party Age
85
Relation
W/o late K.M. Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew George
Relation
S/o George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vakayil Francis Pious
Relation
S/o Vakayil Chakku Francis
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
Relation
Represented by its Senior Vice President Nirav Parekh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nelson Joseph
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o late K.M. Joseph
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Denny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Revathy.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anju Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anumol.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.O. Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent repeatedly. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jessy Joseph vs Mathew George, Vakayil Francis Pious, JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Jessy Joseph vs Mathew George, Vakayil Francis Pious, JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won