O.S. No. 1064/2020

Case between Jedesh Ummar Hamza vs Fathima Dilshad regarding suit under Section 26 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Court

COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany

Order Date

2026-01-07

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jedesh Ummar Hamza is the plaintiff who is absent during the hearing, while Fathima Dilshad is the defendant who is represented. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intention to proceed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intention to proceed with the case.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and did not file a proof affidavit, leading the court to determine that the plaintiff does not intend to proceed.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and did not file a proof affidavit, leading the court to determine that the plaintiff does not intend to proceed.

Supporting Evidence

Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Jedesh Ummar Hamza
Party Age: 37
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Fathima Dilshad
Party Age: 48
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Liffy P Francis
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sidharthan S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit is dismissed.

Evidence: