Case Summary
This case involves petitioners seeking a final decree. The petitioners were absent during the hearing, leading to a dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent, no representation. Called absent, no representation. Advocate Commissioner submitted that documents not given. Petition dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayalekshmi. S
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr.R.Vijay Nath
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R.Ajith Nath
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anoop Kumar. R
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.C.Vijayamma
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G.Govinda pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayalekshmi. S et al vs Anoop Kumar. R et al regarding final decree
Case Code Year
Case between Jayalekshmi. S et al vs Anoop Kumar. R et al regarding final decree