Case Summary
Jaya Chandran.S, the plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit that had been dismissed. Najeema.Y is the defendant in this case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and no steps taken for the respondent.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was absent and did not take any steps to pursue the case.
Petitioner was absent and did not take any steps to pursue the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner was absent and did not take any steps to pursue the case.
Petitioner was absent and did not take any steps to pursue the case.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent and no representation. No steps seen taken for the respondent.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jaya Chandran.S
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Najeema.Y
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Baiju Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jaya Chandran.S vs Najeema.Y regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Jaya Chandran.S vs Najeema.Y regarding restoration of suit