Case Summary
Jasmi filed a suit for injunction against Sainalabdeen and Shameer. T.S. The suit was rejected due to the absence of both parties and failure to remit the necessary court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the absence of both parties. The court noted that necessary court fees were not remitted.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit rejected. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 27th day of June, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jasmi
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainalabdeen
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shameer. T.S
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Anoop.T
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Veliyam K.S.Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit for injunction was rejected.
Evidence:
Suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Injunction
Case Code
Case between Jasmi vs Sainalabdeen et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jasmi vs Sainalabdeen et al regarding injunction