Case Summary
Jasim is the plaintiff seeking partition against Suhara and others. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence. The court pronounced the judgment in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2019).
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jasim
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suhara
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faizal Babu
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ummathukutty
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vipin.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Moideen Kutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Munawar Fyrooz.K.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jasim vs Suhara et al regarding Partition
Case Code Year
Case between Jasim vs Suhara et al regarding Partition