Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.416/2018

Case between Janet.M et al vs C. Muraleedharan et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration
approximately-7 years 8 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are seeking to recover money and gold ornaments from the defendants, who are the legal heirs of Late C.Sobhana. The defendants dispute the claims and state that no such transactions occurred.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the claims regarding the monetary transactions and the gold ornaments. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the claims regarding the monetary transactions and the gold ornaments. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the promissory note.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the promissory note.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence tendered by the plaintiff was found to be insufficient to prove the execution of the promissory note and any monetary transactions.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Janet.M
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o Surendra
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Surendran.B
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sandra Jose
Party Age
28
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Muraleedharan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o Chellappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sali
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o Late C. Sobhana and C.Muraleedharan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Syam Murali
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o late Sobhana and C. Muraleedharan
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory note dated 16/10/2016, Right to Information reply, Property tax receipt dated 02/11/2023.
Defendants Documents
Original Identity Card of Sobhana.C.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.R.Preethakumari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was executed by Late Smt. C.Sobhana to secure a loan of Rs.2,00,000/- from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Report of investigation on the dead body
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides factual details related to the circumstances of Late C.Sobhana's death.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Right to Information Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document includes a response which touches upon the issues raised in the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Cash receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt evidences a transaction related to the finance company regarding the gold ornaments.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified Copy of PL.No13465/2017
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document demonstrates a formal record relevant to the financial dealings surrounding the gold loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt supports claims concerning property assets linked to the parties involved.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Gold loan Specific Ledger
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This ledger records loan specifics for gold transactions involving Late Smt. C.Sobhana.
Reference:
Ext.X1 series
Document Type: Cash Slip
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This cash slip documents the financial transactions relevant to the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.X2 series
Document Type: Personal Loan application
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This application pertains to a personal loan that is contextually linked to the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.X3 series
Document Type: Personal Loan application
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Another application related to personal lending which informs the current case.
Reference:
Ext.X4 series
Document Type: Affidavit executed by Shyam Murali
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This affidavit includes witness testimony that relates to financial dealings involving the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.X5
Document Type: Copy of manual extract document
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This further documentation provides breadth to the plaintiff's financial claims.
Reference:
Ext.X6 series
Document Type: Copy of manual extract document
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Supplemental evidence in the context of the ongoing disputes regarding finances.
Reference:
Ext.X7 series
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This receipt showcases further payments or transactions relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.X8
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This receipt is additional evidence of financial transactions that intersect with the claims.
Reference:
Ext.X9
Document Type: Original Identity card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This identity card was submitted to contest claims made against the defendant regarding financial transactions.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Copy of PL No.13465/2017
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed account which links to the defendants' position in the trial.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Janet.M et al vs C. Muraleedharan et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Janet.M et al vs C. Muraleedharan et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/12/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won