Case Summary
The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Akeel Firdous, which was heard in court. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected because the balance court fee was not remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted the balance court fee was not seen remitted, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akeel Firdous
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mumtaz Shamsuddin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for not remitting the balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs Akeel Firdous regarding rejection of plaint.
Case Code Year
Case between The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs Akeel Firdous regarding rejection of plaint.