Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Jaleel, Nazeema, and Noushad, brought a suit against the defendants, including Nediyil Kunheen and Kunhimuhammed, seeking to fix a boundary and an injunction. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation. This indicates that the plaintiffs did not pursue the matter before the court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and represent their case.
The plaintiffs failed to appear and represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs' counsel submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Name of plaintiffs is called absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jaleel
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o Late Nediyil Kunhava
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nazeema
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- D/o Late Nediyil Kunhava
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Noushad
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o Late Nediyil Kunhava
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sameer
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o Late Nediyil Kunhava
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nazeera
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- D/o Late Nediyil Kunhava
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nediyil Kunheen
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o Kunheethu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed(Died)
- Relation
- S/o Kunheethu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noushad
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Amina
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shoukath
- Party Age
- 27
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shafi
- Party Age
- 25
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C. Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit for fixation of boundary and injunction.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jaleel et al vs Nediyil Kunheen et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Jaleel et al vs Nediyil Kunheen et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.